The Hilltop Companies Don Davis - The Hilltop Companies
Results 1 - 30 of Address, phone number, map, driving directions, hours of operation, services, reviews and more for. Search az-links.info years ago while living at the Dickens . relationship ymca cherokee >HUD-Assisted, Project-Based Losses by State. During his early years in the financial services industry Don served as an originator of Duties for the two organizations included establishing relationship with local to mortgage Servicing of HUD Single and Multifamily Loans, VA, Fannie Mae, for Dynaxys Don lead a number of projects focused in the following areas. INCREASING FUNDING TO FULLY FUND THE CURRENT OPTION YEAR .. ADDRESS, BANK ROUTING NUMBER), WEST GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC DYNAXYS, LLC, $16,,, HUDCCOPC, , OTHER ROYAL CONNECTION INCORPORATED, $52,, HUDCCPHI
December 19 In Expresser Transport Corp. In light of the unambiguous contract provision, the Board rejected the contractor's requests for discovery as unnecessary and because they "do not rise above the level of a speculative hope, and amount to little more than the suggestion that something might turn up. This will resolve conflicts expeditiously and definitively.
December 13 US21, Inc. The ASBCA dismissed an appeal by Courtney Ake for failure to prosecute after the contractor failed to respond to multiple board orders to reply to the Government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. In Size Appeal of Lynxnet, LLCthe OHA affirmed the Area Office's finding that an SBA-approved 8 a joint venture was an eligible small business because i it was unpopulated as required by the regulations to be eligible for an exception to the affiliation rules and ii the manufacturing of the contract items would be performed by the joint venture partners.
In Size Appeal of Spinnaker Joint Venture, LLCthe OHA affirmed the Area Office's finding that a firm was not affiliated with its large mentor and joint venture partner and, therefore, that the joint venture was an eligible small business for the procurement.
December 7 In Veteran Shredding, LLCafter rejecting the protester's contention that the "substantial chance" test for standing never applies in preaward protests, the Court of Federal Claims held that the protester lacked standing to challenge the VA's decision to cancel an SDVOSB set-aside and resolicit as a VOSB set-aside because the protester offered the third highest technically acceptable bid, lacked a substantial chance at award, and, therefore, could not show the direct economic interest in the procurement necessary to be considered an interested party.
The case boiled down to the fact that the contract and the circumstances clearly put the contractor on notice that security concerns made the performance environment unpredictable. In First Division Design, LLCwhich involved a contract terminated for convenience after the Government realized it had incorrectly accepted an offer to supply floor tiles made in China, the ASBCA denied the contractor's T for C claim, which was based largely on the alleged delay in terminating the contract and the costs allegedly incurred during extended negotiations prior to the termination, because: The Board also resolved the question of which of two diametrically opposed declarations should be accepted by looking at contemporaneous documentation to determine which declaration was more consistent with it.
This needs to be elevated to the next level in your chain of command for resolution and I expect to hear from them directly. The GAO sustained a protest by Shearwater Mission Support, LLCholding that the agency's discussion questions suggesting the protester's prices were unreasonably low were misleading because they were based on a price realism analysis that was not contemplated by the solicitation for a fixed-price contract. A proposed rule would amend the FAR to implement the final rule published by the SBA implementing section of the National Defense Authorization Act for FYwhich revised and standardized the limitations on subcontracting, including the nonmanufacturer rule, that apply to small business concerns under FAR part 19 procurements.
Comments are due by February 4, A final rule amends the DFARS to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY that removes the requirement to make a best procurement approach determination in order to use an interagency acquisition. Effective tomorrow, a final rule amends the DFARS to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY that repeals the Fiscal Year restrictions on the source of photovoltaic devices in contracts awarded by DoD that result in DoD ownership of photovoltaic devices by means other than DoD purchase of the photovoltaic devices as end products.
A proposed rule would amend the DFARS to implement sections of the National Defense Authorization Acts for FY and that establish limitations and prohibitions on the use of the lowest-price technically-acceptable source selection process. A proposed rule would amend the DFARS to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY regarding set-asides for architect-engineer and construction design contracts, specifically by: The proposed rule would: Finally, SBA is proposing to remove the kit assembler exception to the non-manufacturer rule.
December 3 In Partner 4 Recoverywhich involved three unsuccessful post-award protests of the Government's awards of contracts in three geographical zones, each of those contracts being intended to provide the supplemental resources needed to implement FEMA's Public Assistance program in response to major disasters and emergencies, the Court of Federal Claims held, inter alia, that: Comments are due by January 28, November 29 In Innovative Element, LLCthe Court of Federal Claims denied the Government's motion to dismiss and, instead, allowed the protester to amend its already amended Complaint in order to challenge the Government's decision to cancel an amended solicitation because, in the court's view, allowing the amendment would better serve the interests of judicial economy than requiring the protester to file a new protest.
The Board also rejected the contractor's arguments regarding alleged i superior knowledge by the Government, ii breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and iii unilateral mistake.
In Interaction Research Institute, Inc. In Ruby Emerald Construction Co. In Veterans Contracting Group, Inc. November 20 The GAO sustained a protest by AOC Connect, LLC because the agency concluded the awardee's staffing proposal was acceptable even though the contemporaneous evaluation record did not contain any "evidence that the evaluators considered whether [the awardee's] proposal included information concerning the skills and experience of [its] non-key personnel," or, indeed, any "discussion at all of [the awardee's] proposed staffing.
November 17 In Metrica Team Venturean unsuccessful post-award protest, the Court of Federal Claims used the principles of contract interpretation to hold that, under the terms of this solicitation, a joint-venture bidder or both of its members were required to have an approved CAS system, i.
November 14 In Timberline Helicopters, Inc. That declaration was what the protester had originally argued was missing from the procurement when it filed its GAO protests. In FY, there are approximately 1.
These units are under the direct management of the PHAs. The Moving to Work demonstration program gives PHAs the opportunity to design and test innovative, locally developed strategies that are designed to use Federal dollars more efficiently, help residents become self-sufficient, and increase housing choices for low-income families.
az-links.info in az-links.info | source code search engine
The demonstration program gives PHAs exemptions from many public housing rules and more flexibility in how they use their Federal funds. OIG has issued one report on the Moving to Work demonstration program focusing the need for HUD to develop criteria to evaluate the success of the program. OIG will also evaluate how well HUD monitors these agencies related to specific areas of risk such as legal and lobbying expenses.
Improving HUD s Execution of and Accountability for Grant Funds HUD awards grants to all levels of government and to the private sector for developing viable communities by promoting integrated approaches that provide decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income persons.
OIG plans to focus on significant areas related to the lack of controls over and accountability for grant funds.
Dynaxys Wins $75M HUD Contract
Protecting the Integrity of Housing Insurance and Guarantee Programs FHA is the Federal Government s single largest program to extend home ownership to individuals and families who lack the savings, credit history, or income to qualify for a conventional mortgage.
The seriously delinquent rate, an indicator of future claim costs, is down 1.HUD - Demonstration of a Heads Up Display in a 2015 Mini Cooper
At the end of, FHA had more than 7. FHA issued various mortgagee letters announcing program changes limiting the amount of the allowable draw, mandating the use of escrow accounts or money set aside to ensure continued and timely payment of property charges, and requiring the use of a financial assessment as part of the loan origination process.
However, On December 20, FHA announced via a mortgagee letter that the implementation for financial assessment and funding requirements for the payment of property charges would be delayed pending a review of comments received after publishing the various mortgagee letters and its notice in the Federal Register.
Significant changes in the single-family mortgage industry and the meltdown of the subprime market require continual emphasis on single-family lenders by OIG. OIG plans to continue its efforts in external and internal audits of HUD s activities in the single-family mortgage industry. The economic slowdown has increased demand for loss mitigation actions, including but not limited to loan modifications and other types of mortgage assistance.
On November 1, FHA issued a mortgagee letter clarifying HUD s requirements and to communicate expectations for servicers who engage in loss mitigation during foreclosure. HUD expects servicers to keep open lines of communication with borrowers so that borrowers can notify servicers of any changes in their circumstances that may qualify them for loss mitigation options.
Therefore, OIG plans to increase its efforts in external audits of servicers and internal audits of HUD s activities in loan mitigation activities. Following the meaningful impact of its prior servicer reviews, OIG is working with various assistant U. The Office of Audit is placing an emphasis on civil mortgage fraud and will actively seek out instances involving false claims deserving civil complaints to recover Federal funds. Lenders are targeted for audit through the use of data-mining techniques, along with prioritizing audit requests from outside sources.
The task involves reporting once a year.
OIG has oversight responsibilities for these CDBG funds and will perform disaster reviews as part of the annual audit plan.
To determine whether HUD had adequate oversight of property flipping. To determine whether HUD had adequate controls in place to monitor indemnification agreements to recover losses from claims paid for FHA-insured loans.
To determine the cost of preforeclosure sale flopping to the FHA insurance fund. To determine whether lenders received excess profit from processing Ginnie Mae loan modifications without providing any portion to HUD. To determine whether 1 HUD s use of the partial claim option as a loss mitigation tool adequately protected the insurance fund, 2 HUD s use of the deed in lieu of foreclosure loss disposition option adequately protected the insurance fund, and 3 HUD s oversight of the FHA loss mitigation programs was effective.
To determine whether HUD took effective Atlanta actions to enforce the resolution of the deficiencies noted in its monitoring review of the Vieques Sports Complex. To determine the effectiveness and efficiency of HUD s controls to ensure that 1 home-buyer activities funded by the participating jurisdictions complied with the HOME program s primary residency requirement for the duration of the affordability period and 2 applicable resale or recaptured requirements for homebuyer activities not meeting the affordability period were enforced.
To determine whether HUD s oversight of PIH environmental reviews ensured that 1 the required Fort Worth reviews were performed by the responsible entity and 2 all required documents were submitted before HUD released funds.
To assess the adequacy of HUD s oversight of Philadelphia its enhanced vouchers.
To determine whether HUD 1 had adequate procedures in place to identify, monitor, and evaluate public housing New York agencies with interfunds and 2 took appropriate actions to curtail improper practices when borrowing from restricted HUD programs. To determine Philadelphia whether HUD s oversight was adequate to ensure that PHAs complied with Federal lobbying disclosure requirements and restrictions. To determine whether HUD needs to develop and implement controls to monitor PHAs expenditures for outside legal services to ensure that the services are reasonable, necessary, and procured according to applicable requirements non-recovery Act funds.
To determine whether HUD had adequate controls over the administration of demolition and disposition projects to ensure the reliability of Inventory Management System-PIH Information Center inventory data related to these projects.
To determine whether HUD s Veteran s Affairs Supportive Housing program s monitoring procedures and reporting system details were adequate to ensure that PHAs administered the program vouchers in accordance with program requirements. To determine whether HUD needs to update its policies and regulations regarding overincome residents in public housing. To determine whether HUD had adequate controls to monitor compliance with the community service and self-sufficiency requirement.
To determine whether HUD s monitoring procedures ensured that project owners and management agents of HUD-insured multifamily properties did not make unauthorized loans or distributions from project funds. To determine whether 1 HUD s Integrated Real Estate Management System irems displayed the correct data from each source multifamily database to assist HUD Chicago project managers in monitoring projects in their portfolio and 2 irems promptly notified HUD project managers of mortgage delinquencies or defaults and required action.
To determine whether HUD s controls were sufficient to Atlanta ensure that front-line costs, direct costs, and management fees were not excessive across the portfolio. To determine whether HUD provided sufficient guidance to owners and management agents to ensure implementation of use agreement restrictions for affordable set-aside units. To determine the adequacy of HUD s procedures for administering the Neighborhood Stabilization Program NSP and measuring Atlanta its effectiveness, grantees compliance with program requirements, and whether the program and grantees achieved their goals.
To evaluate selected general and application controls over the Financial IS Audit Data Mart for compliance with Federal requirements and standards. To evaluate the effectiveness of general and application controls over Ginnie Mae information systems for compliance with HUD information technology policies and Federal information system security and financial management requirements.
To evaluate the effectiveness of general and application controls over the Program Accounting System for compliance with HUD information technology policies and Federal information system security and financial management requirements. To evaluate the effectiveness of general and application controls over the Loan Accounting System for compliance with HUD information technology policies and Federal information system security and financial management requirements.
To evaluate the effectiveness of general and application controls over the FHA Subsidiary Ledger for compliance with HUD information technology policies and Federal information system security and financial management requirements. To evaluate the effectiveness of general and application controls over the Single Family Housing Enterprise Data Warehouse for compliance with HUD information technology policies and Federal information system security and financial management requirements.
To determine whether HUD properly procured and made reasonable payments for architectural and engineering services. To determine 1 HUD s compliance with Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act reporting and improper payment reduction requirements and 2 whether PIH and the Office of Housing s corrective action plans addressed the root causes of HUD s improper payments and were effectively implemented. To perform the annual consolidated financial statement audit as required by the Chief Financial Officers Act as amended.
To determine whether HUD followed applicable procedures and requirements in regard to the procurement and administration of its service contract with Dynaxys, LLC; specifically, to ensure that HUD officials 1 provided for full and open competition resulting in assurance of price reasonableness, 2 provided adequate oversight and monitoring for contract-related activities, and 3 maintained all required supporting documentation and records. The planning of external audits, therefore, is intended to be flexible to enable OIG to perform the highest priority work at hand.
Depending on the volume and nature of audit requests, OIG intends to selectively target high-risk programs and jurisdictions. With this in mind, the following types of external audits have been identified as priority areas during this planning cycle.
As the opportunity permits, OIG audit managers will focus their audit resources on the following areas. Single-family lender origination reviews continue to be a priority for FY due to the abuses being experienced in single-family programs. A specialized audit program has been developed for the purpose of targeting lenders, considering a number of highrisk indicators. In addition, OIG plans to perform audits of mortgage companies underwriting procedures and servicers performing loss mitigation actions.
Community planning and development: