Global meet vs gotomeeting

PGi GlobalMeet vs GoToMeeting Competitor Report | Web Conferencing | Datanyze

global meet vs gotomeeting

In Friedman's view, voice over Internet (VoIP), file sharing, and wireless were the "steroids" that have accelerated the flattening of global. Download, install and test GoToMeeting software, read popular topics, user Once you've joined a meeting, use this guide to learn more about the Control. GoToMeeting image: This service puts the online meeting and It has data centers worldwide to ensure high-quality communication no matter.

It allows its users to enjoy the functionality and simplicity offered by a few other tools, but at a comparatively lower rate. GoToMeeting makes it very easy to join or initiate web-based conferences, and this is yet another thing that users love about this software. Let us now get to learn about a few benefits that this software allows you to enjoy. Once you create a meeting you simply need to send the participants a custom URL, and they just need to click on the same.

To join the conversation participants have to enter a code or PIN, which is something not offered by many other similar tools including Join. It also offers a free plan and a few paid plans and you can choose one that you find the best according to your needs. However, GoToMeeting also offers co-browsing and break-out session which is not offered by Join. Security Features Both these tools have interesting security features like user authentication, security control over desktop sharing, and encryption, but GoToMeeting also offers one-time password facility, something that is not included in the Join.

Meeting Follow-up Features While Join. Integrations Compared While Join. Pricing Plans Compared Both Join. Both have a free version. The free plan of Join. Next is the Pro Plan of Join.

global meet vs gotomeeting

Though both the plans are priced almost similarly, Join. The third paid plan of Join.

global meet vs gotomeeting

On the other hand, the next paid version of GoToMeeting is the Pro plan, priced a little higher than that of Join. Though the price is slightly higher and the number of participants less, but GoToMeeting does have quite a few interesting helpful features to offer.

I think these stats speak for themselves. The recurring themes seem to be that video calling helps collaboration, problem-solving, engagement and productivity, and building company culture. The various teams within Process Street have moved from their old service to a new service for holding meetings.

This change was sparked by pain points we found within the sales team. When a video conferencing service struggles with quality, ease of access, or limited functionality it makes a real impact on our client relations.

This was a pain point we noticed which needed to be addressed. How easy was it to get set up? Zoom Not too much difficulty here. I had to download the program to my computer in order to participate in the calls. You can just set up a new room. Then you shoot the link to the meeting to someone and they follow it. Maybe takes 20 seconds from clicking the link to joining the meeting while you wait for the program to start up and sort itself out.

Not bad at all. The UX designer kept their focus. I felt pretty confused while going through most of the process. I had to download the program in order to use the system.

Why customers prefer GoToMeeting Over Webex

Someone can prove me wrong. If you want to hand over annotation tools, remote access, and other advanced features then you need to download the software.

You can create a room with a custom name — which I like.

global meet vs gotomeeting

Then anyone who follows that link can jump into your room. This is a system used by a few others on here, and I like it.

Neither I nor Ben were particularly sure where everything was initially. It joins the rest with a lower score. That has to count in its favor. More friction than some of the other options: Once you have Skype it is pretty simple. My Skype contact list is filled with people I spoke to once because of that thing at that place, you know? People who I am likely never to contact again. Nonetheless, the mobile apps are good. Neither micro nor soft, but still not great.

I ended up downloading the program twice. For a moment, I was even a little worried I was downloading some kind of virus, given the strange filename and forceful process. Ben had the same experience. I was still fairly confused at the point when we gave up on GoToMeeting, but I was particularly confused at the beginning. I once started a radio station a decade ago called Curl where we asked a local school if they could donate us some PCs. Our radio station was running from Winamp on Windows Starting up GoToMeeting gave me flashbacks of that little room filled with wires and its appalling lack of adherence to fire safety regulations.

However, if I wanted to transfer hosting duties to Ben so he could show me his screen and use the advanced features then he had to download it too. Not too big a deal I suppose. Until GoToMeeting dropped him from the call as part of its built-in user journey for people upgrading.

No pun for you. It is a lightweight video chat tool for speed and simplicity. I only had to make an account when I wanted to lock access to the video call, while we were testing that feature. Even pals of yours without Google accounts can join in the video chats with almost all the functionalities still present — bar text chat, for some reason. Hangouts feels to me like the video call solution for the avid emailer.

global meet vs gotomeeting

Everything is negotiated through the emails and your contacts list through email becomes your contacts for Hangouts. There are a lot of Skype parallels in ways if you choose to see them. Mobile apps to make it simpler too.

Does it feel professional and high quality? Zoom As difficult as it is to compare quality between the different platforms without getting all technical, Zoom feels like it has a high level of quality. The audio quality, in particular, stands out with Zoom as being crisp and clear. The UI for Zoom is sharp, smooth, and professional. There would be nothing embarrassing or awkward about introducing a client to the software.

Their core service is to allow collaboration in meetings via video. Not that I like things which appear corporate, but you might. It might be important to you. You might not want a video calling software which shows your disembodied head floating around in a bubble for the duration of the call. Still, I think Skype is generally considered professional enough. Its quality varies, mind. We used to use Skype at Process Street for our calls.

We switched away from Skype partly due to the slightly lower quality when compared to Zoom and others. Moreover, Skype seems to push its users into using its chat features when all we wanted was the video call. We already have Slack. Not best for business. It has the drab grays you expect from a stuffy office.

Comparison of web conferencing software - Wikipedia

Considering the platform was taking up a good bit of bandwidth, I expected more. Go to the in-browser version. Audio was good, video was good, display of guests on the screen was good, chat worked well. Pretty fine all round. The quality of Google Hangouts can sometimes come under question but it offers no worse a service than Skype, in my mind. Sometimes, I even prefer Hangouts. Zoom Zoom uses the room system, which a number of the other platforms have as well. This system means you create one URL which represents a meeting room.

Whenever you visit that URL you are placed within the meeting. The Zoom meeting system has a slight downside compared to the others in that the URL string is just a series of numbers. Whereas some of the others have the ability to set custom URLs in their free versions. However, Zoom has Zapier automations you can use to integrate it within your workflows — which is a massive plus. In my eyes, this makes Zoom an excellent candidate for a corporate choice. Zooming ahead of the competition.

global meet vs gotomeeting

It can help teams have meetings remotely while all working from one screen. In that sense, Join. It also has the option of using Zapier integrations, though it appears to only have one premade one up to this point.

They could be so much better. They should be so much better. Not angry, just disappointed. Improve your Flow, Microsoft. However, remember that this is a big established product from a massive established company.