Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis

Author: Taugor Meztitilar
Country: Poland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 18 February 2017
Pages: 492
PDF File Size: 3.32 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.23 Mb
ISBN: 223-7-62100-227-7
Downloads: 86564
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faekora

Dingpolitik and an internet of things

Is there something like a matter-of-fact? This article has no associated abstract. History of Western Philosophy. This brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess. dungpolitik

From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public

How can we re-order the balance and get involved in Dingpolitik? How can this be achieved? Legitimacy in Realist Thought. This page was last modified on 24 Novemberat But how to get form objects to matter-of-concerns to things?

International Law and the Prevention of Genocide. Please Visit Reserve Page. In the first case, something is represented in a right way when the procedures around the representation are correct law and political science.

A catalog of questions in this text. Sign in Create an account. Request removal from index.

This, asserts Latour, is what the exhibition in question explores. Taking these things back into the design loop is one of my missions, with the statement in mind that the way content dijgpolitik created and consumed has at least as much importance as the technology driving it. While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour claims that the influence of things have an even role in creating this assembly.


Alek Chance – – Journal of Military Ethics 12 3: Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: Sungmoon Kim – – History of Political Thought 29 3: MIT Press, crossposted on www.

There is a need to investigate how latiur through what medium the matters of concern are discussed. Especially when these things, being digital or physical, are capable of sharing, posting, editing, deleting content. Thucydides on the Moralization of Conflict. In the second, it is the re-presentation of the object in relation to those who observe it science, technology. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.

Dingpolitik and an internet of things | Masters of Media

Matt Sleat – – Political Theory 42 3: The point to make is that objects trigger the connections of public, or at least dingpoliitik, issues. The relevancy of performing research dingpolktik the topic of an Internet of Things lies in the fact that, although seemingly the concept has faded into the background, reality might be catching up.

Return to Practice Literature. Here Latour ends by providing a set of guidelines if you will, or parameters for success of dingpolitik, summed up in my own interpretation:. This blog is protected by Dave ‘s Spam Karma 2: Realpolitik, Punishment and Control: Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences.


From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik (Latour) | Technology and Culture Reading Group

In this proof finding, lots of problems occur: Latour continuous by pointing out that another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on dingpoliyik differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with a set of indifferences. How are all involved parties, people and things assembled?

With a whole set of point made, the question of how Dingpolitik can take shape now remains. While always describing the how, and the procedures around the issue, when it comes down to what the issue is, political philosophy has remained silent throughout history.

Here, he introduces a new approach, by suggesting to look into matter of concern, rather than matters of fact. Perspectives for an Alternative Parliamentarism.

What if objects themselves can gather, spread and claim issues, turning each patour into matters-of-concern? It is time to go back to things. MIT Press, http: The concept of Realpolitik has shifted since the days of Bismarck. Sign in to use this feature. Christopher Norris – – Philosophy and Social Criticism 17 1: Class of Alumni: The Origin of Political Liberty in Confucianism: