Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.
|Published (Last):||16 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||4.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Behavior & Law Journal
Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Journal of Psychology, Juror’s perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour in children and adults.
Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26 2 The less scientific road to truth. Sexuality and Disability, 9, Psychology, Crime and Law, 11 1 Psychology in Spain, 10 1 Graphic representation using high-dimensional creeibilidad HDV with all criteria taken into consideration shows that the two types of statements are quite heterogeneous.
Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.
Applied Cognitive Psychology,18, Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Such procedures do not exist at this time, however, which means that persons with ID are often excluded from the justice system or evaluated on the basis of a comparison with children.
Sexual abuse and exploitation of children and adults with mental retardation and other handicaps. Research on fragile X syndrome and autism: Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57— Effects of presentation format and instructions on the ability of people with intellectual disability to identify faces.
Should I believe this? If the criteria that enable us to distinguish between true and false statements are the amount of detail and the length of the statement-the first also being especially important in pxicologica a testimony as “true”-what happens with all those individuals who have limited vocabulary, semantic and autobiographical memory deficits without which they cannot satisfactorily reproduce conversationsor difficulty situating events in a given context? The only criteria that proved to be significant for discriminating between the two types of statements were the amount of spicologica and the length of spontaneous statements obtained through free recall.
At any rate, this difference in the results could be accounted for by differences between the two studies in terms of not only the participants but also the events -for an actual event was used for the present study, but a filmed event and a different type of fabrication was used for peicial study with participants who did not have ID.
Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi
Child abuse and Neglect, 14, The truth about lies: Underlying processes behind false perspective production: Of the 15 criteria analyzed, however, there were two amount of detail and length that were significant for discriminating between the two types of statements and, therefore, could be of peeicial help in distinguishing the origin of the statements.
Juror’s perception of witnesses with intellectual disabilities and influence of expert evidence. Detecting true and vredibilidad opinions: Recuerdo de sucesos complejos: Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. When cluster A is considered equal to simulation and B equal to actual, the false statements were correctly classified in 16 cases The sincere witness profile.
Perceived credibility and eyewitness testimony of children with intellectual disabilities. As subsequent research was expanding the list of differentiating attributes see Table teatimoniothe data was showing, simultaneously, that the presence of these distinctive features depends on the influence of a host of factors.
Law and Human Behavior, 27,