Political theory and the multicultural society. Bhikhu parekh. Cultural diversity in modern societies takes many forms, of which three are most common. First. Bhikhu Parekh’s Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory sets out to design paths for multiculturalism understood both as political. Kelly, Paul () Situating Parekh’s multiculturalism: Bhikhu Parekh and twentieth-century British political theory. In: Uberoi, Varun and.

Author: Tygom Kajigrel
Country: Cameroon
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 27 October 2018
Pages: 379
PDF File Size: 8.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.92 Mb
ISBN: 562-2-42693-373-4
Downloads: 40894
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nagar

M ulticultural societies in their current form are new to our age and throw up theoretical and political problems that have no parallel in history.

Pages to import images to Wikidata. Marx argued that in a class-divided society nulticulturalism state cannot be impartial, and represents a subtle way of institutionalizing and legitimizing the rule of the dominant class.

Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. This does not mean that it has no powers of self-determination and inner impulses, but rather that it is porous and subject to external influences which it assimilates in its now autonomous ways. An Essay on Bhikhu Parekh. When you read these chapters you start to understand the difficulty and importance of finding acceptable solutions.

Political cultures, multicultuarlism politics Whatever their differences, contemporary multicjlturalism societies raise several common and novel questions relating to the cultural rights of minorities, the nature of collective rights, the rights and obligations of immigrants, the ways of accommodating dual diasporic loyalties, the variety of the level and forms of citizenship, whether all cultures deserve equal respect, multiculturailsm they should be judged in their own terms, or ours, or universal standards, how we can communicate across and resolve deep differences between cultures, and so forth.

Amazon Restaurants Parfkh delivery from local restaurants. To call contemporary Western society liberal is not only to homogenize and oversimplify it, but also to give liberals a moral and cultural monopoly over it and to treat the rest as illegitimate and troublesome intruders. Although Turkey under the Ottoman empire had fairly large Christian and Jewish communities and granted them far greater autonomy than do most contemporary societies, it was not and never saw itself as a multicultural society.


Political doctrines are ways of structuring political life and do not offer a comprehensive philosophy of life. The book displays all the wisdom and the fighting aprekh of a man who has been at the forefront of the theoretical and political battles over multiculturalism.

Learn more about Amazon Prime.

Rethinking Multiculturalism Cultural Diversity and Political Theory

By defining Multiculturalism as a ‘perspective on human life’, the discussions are developed. The Constitution presupposed a much higher rate of economic growth and a much greater degree of equitable distribution of resources among the diverse communities than has proved to be the case.

Examining the Politics of Recognition. For its part, society concedes the legitimacy of some of these demands and goes at least some way towards meeting them. Parekh challenges the continuing legacy of moral monism in contemporary liberalism. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty.

Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. The traditional political theory either ignores this subject altogether or gives a highly misleading account of it. Such a theory needs to take full account of the fact that multicultural societies vary in the kind, degree and depth of their multiculturality, and are not all alike.

First, Parekh points out the manner in which current liberal theories of justice and multiculturalism, such as that of Rawls and Kymlicka, exclude the interests of those that are not specifically organized around distinctively Western notions of the individual and the self. However, they can be defined in several different ways, of which the liberal is only one and not always the most coherent.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Each of them — be it liberalism, conservatism, socialism or nationalism — is embedded in a particular culture, represents a particular vision of the good life, and is necessarily narrow and partial. It achieves a level of theoretical coherence and a depth of insight that is rare and impressive.


Bhikhu Parekh: Political theory and the multicultural society / Radical Philosophy

Closed cultures cannot and do not wish or need to talk to each other. The modern state represents a very different view of social unity. From a multiculturalist perspective, no bhilhu doctrine mutliculturalism ideology can represent the full truth of human life. Since each defines its identity in terms of its differences from others or what it is not, it feels threatened by them and seeks to safeguard its integrity by resisting their influences and even avoiding all contacts with them.

Political theory and the multicultural society

In some societies cultural communities are primarily religious; in others they are ethnic or linguistic in nature. In some societies minority communities are recent arrivals; in others they have lived for centuries; in yet others they were brought by colonial powers and retain an insider—outsider status.

Cultures grow out of conscious and unconscious interactions with each other, define their identity in terms of what they take to be their significant other, and are at least partially multicultural in their origins and constitution. Indeed, it is precisely because it cherishes cultural plurality that it accommodates those that do not share its dominant cultural ethos.

Homi Bhabha, University of Chicago Parekh’s book is the most comprehensive defense of a pluralist perspective on cultural diversity that has been offered so far.

As a territorially constituted entity, the modern state accommodated territorial but not cultural decentralization. Its members do not directly belong to each other as in an ethnic group but through their mediating membership of a shared community, and they are committed to each other because they are all in their own different ways committed to a common historical community.